LogCaster Join the waitlist
Dozzle alternative

Your logs, fully managed — and not tied to the Docker socket.

Dozzle is a brilliant self-hosted viewer for Docker logs on a host you run. LogCaster is the managed, source-agnostic version: stream from any source over NDJSON or Vector, share one live view across your team with real access control, and never run or secure it yourself.

Why teams move

Dozzle is great — until you outgrow self-hosting it.

Credit where it's due: Dozzle is one of the best free tools in its lane. It's open-source, mounts the Docker socket, auto-discovers your containers, and streams live logs in your browser in under a minute. For a homelab, a single host, or local debugging, it's hard to beat. LogCaster isn't trying to take that away.

The move happens when a small team needs more than a self-hosted, Docker-only viewer. Dozzle is something you run and secure on your own infrastructure, and it reads logs from the container runtime. LogCaster is managed — there's nothing for you to host, patch, or lock down — and it's source-agnostic: point any source at it over open NDJSON or Vector, not just Docker. Then scope each service to its own channel, give the right people access, and everyone shares the same live view.

Side by side

LogCaster vs. Dozzle

An honest read. Dozzle facts reflect the open-source project and Dozzle Cloud's current tiers.

  LogCaster Dozzle
Hosting Fully managed — we run it, you sign in. Self-hosted — you run the container and mount the Docker socket.
Sources Source-agnostic — any source over NDJSON / Vector. Docker-centric — reads the container runtime (Docker, Swarm, K8s).
Live streaming Yes — streaming-first. Yes — and it's excellent at it.✓ real-time, low latency
Team access Roles + per-channel scoping, one shared view. Multi-user auth / proxy-forward; bound to the host you run.
What you operate Nothing. A container, the socket, auth, and upgrades on your infra.
Pricing One flat monthly price. Free & open-source self-hosted; Dozzle Cloud $10–$39/mo.

When Dozzle is the better pick

It's a genuinely great tool. Choose Dozzle if you want:

  • Free and self-hosted, with logs that never leave your own infrastructure (MIT-licensed, Docker OSS-sponsored).
  • Docker-only, zero-config viewing — mount the socket and you're live in under a minute.
  • A homelab or single-host setup, or local debugging, where a tiny stateless container is exactly right.
  • No monthly bill at all — the self-hosted edition is free forever.
Questions

Moving from Dozzle

Is LogCaster a replacement for Dozzle?+
It depends on what you love about Dozzle. If you want a self-hosted, Docker-only viewer you run yourself for free, Dozzle is excellent and LogCaster isn't trying to replace that. LogCaster is the managed, source-agnostic option: any source over NDJSON or Vector, one live view shared across your team with access control, and nothing for you to run.
Is LogCaster free like Dozzle?+
No. Dozzle is open-source and free to self-host. LogCaster is a managed service at one flat monthly price — you trade hosting and upkeep for not having to run, secure, or upgrade it yourself.
Can I send non-Docker logs to LogCaster?+
Yes. Dozzle reads container logs from the Docker socket; LogCaster is source-agnostic. It ingests structured NDJSON and works with Vector, so any source Vector can read streams in — not just Docker containers.
Do I have to run or maintain anything?+
No. Dozzle is self-hosted, so you run the container, mount the socket, and handle auth and upgrades. LogCaster is fully managed — you sign in and stream your logs.
When can I switch?+
LogCaster is in active development. Join the waitlist and we'll reach out as access opens.
Get early access

Outgrowing the homelab setup?

LogCaster is opening access to small dev teams who want a managed, shared log view. Join the waitlist.